🔗 Share this article

Australia's decisive policy to restrict social platforms access for individuals under sixteen is creating waves internationally. Lawmakers, child protection groups, and parents are observing intently to see if this strategy will become a template for countries abroad.

European Movement

Across Europe, a growing group of states are exploring parallel bans.

• Denmark has announced a prohibition on social media for children under fifteen, with the PM arguing that smartphones and networks are "taking away our children's innocence". The policy could be formalized soon.
• Norway is set to enforce a age restriction of 15, highlighting the need to safeguard the young from the "power of the AI".
• Ireland is working on a digital ID system to verify the user details of social media account holders. The media minister have suggested that an similar ban could be "an tools under consideration".
• In Spain, the leader has asked lawmakers to enact a law raising the access age for using social media to 16.
• In France, the president has floated the idea of a ban for under-15s, and a parliamentary commission has suggested a comparable move, alongside an overnight "screen time restriction" for adolescents.
• The authorities in The Netherlands has advised guardians to block their kids from social media before 15.

For the broader EU, the bloc's legislature has approved a advisory statement calling for a ban for teenagers under 16 without guardian approval is provided. While it highlights of the "addictive" nature of these apps, the step does not establish enforceable legislation.

"A clear age restriction is a good first step," stated one European lawmaker driving the initiative.

The UK: An Evidence-Based Stance

For the United Kingdom, the administration has not ruled out a future ban, arguing that "no measure is discarded" but maintaining any action must be "based on conclusive data".

Earlier, momentum built behind a legislative effort to introduce controls on social media use by minors, but it was eventually watered down. Nonetheless, the administration pledged to investigate the matter.

Campaign organizations have raised concerns. A prominent charity set up by the relatives of a girl who died after being exposed to dangerous online content argues that a blanket age ban might not improve online safety and could lead to a "sudden drop-off" of exposure when young people turn 16.

"The Australian ban is a reaction to the inability of the Silicon Valley to build platforms and apps that are safe and fit for young users," stated a leading child protection advocate.

The United States: A Fragmented Approach

Stateside, regulation is primarily occurring at the local level amid national stalemate.

• The state of Utah demands adult approval for minors to use social media and controls late-night use.
• Florida has signed a bill prohibiting those below 14 from accessing social media, though it faces court battles.
• Virginia has passed a rule capping minors to 60 minutes of social media access per day, with additional use needing a guardian's okay.
• Georgia, The state of Tennessee, and Louisiana have similarly introduced measures demanding parental consent for teenagers to create social media accounts.

Despite widespread concern and proposals from certain figures to copy Australia's path, a nationwide ban is right now seen as a distant prospect.

Global Perspectives

Beyond the West, further countries are similarly exploring options.

• The Malaysian government aims to ban social media for those under sixteen effective next year.
• Brazil has lifted the required age for one major platform to 16.

However, world agencies adopt a more cautious position. The UN children's agency has cautioned that blanket prohibitions have downsides and "could prove counterproductive". The body points out that social networks can be a "critical link" for vulnerable youth and that regulation should not be a "excuse" for social media firms to prioritize user protection.

As this worldwide discussion continues, the policies of this nation and others show that policymakers globally are less and less content to wait for the industry to self-regulate.